UGRSTM
Penile implant for erectile dysfunction

Penile Implant for Erectile Dysfunction

20 years of experience. Evidence-based. Performed personally by Prof. Agustín Fraile Poblador.

When medication no longer helps and erections no longer occur, a hydraulic penile prosthesis is the most effective solution. This page explains what a penile implant is, when it may be appropriate – and why the surgeon's experience makes the decisive difference.

Prof. Agustín Fraile Poblador

Medically Reviewed By: Prof. Agustín Fraile Poblador

Jörg Hagen

Editorial Review: Jörg Hagen, Lead Physician

Updated on July 22, 2026

What Is a Penile Implant?

A penile implant – also known as a penile prosthesis – is a surgically implanted system that allows men with severe erectile dysfunction to achieve a controlled, natural-feeling erection. It replaces the body's own erectile function mechanically and permanently.

The gold standard is the three-piece hydraulic penile prosthesis (three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis). It consists of three components, all fully concealed inside the body:

  • Two cylinders, inserted into the natural erectile tissue (corpora cavernosa)
  • A pump in the scrotum, used to trigger and end the erection
  • A reservoir in the lower abdomen, which stores the fluid for the cylinders and is inserted through the same skin incision

The system enables an erection at the touch of a button – discreet, natural-feeling, and available at any time. When not activated, the components are not visible from the outside. Modern implants also feature an antibacterial surface to protect against infection and are available in finely graduated sizes, so that an individually suited solution can be found for almost every patient.

Studies show very high patient satisfaction. When the procedure is performed to a high standard, partner satisfaction rises to as much as 88 percent.

Prof. Agustín Fraile Poblador and Dr. Alessandro Perotti

Penile Implant at a Glance

Before we go into more depth on penile implants, here is a first orientation:

Indication

Severe erectile dysfunction, when medication no longer helps

Gold standard

Three-piece hydraulic penile prosthesis

Duration of surgery

Only approx. 90 minutes; thanks to our extensive experience

Anaesthesia

General anaesthesia

Hospital stay

Outpatient (one night in a hotel recommended)

First activation

after approx. 4 weeks

Sexual abstinence

5 weeks

Time off work

approx. 4 days; 1 week for physically demanding work

Cost

approx. €9,500 plus the implant itself (approx. €8,000)

The first step isn't a procedure – it's a conversation.

Jörg Hagen

Your personal point of contact, Mr Jörg Hagen, Medical Director of UGRS International GmbH, is happy to answer your questions about the treatment and its process.

+49 6151 606 1034+49 152 275 552 37kontakt@ugrs.de

Monday to Friday

9:30 AM – 7:00 PM

or by individual arrangement

Show contents

Causes of Severe Erectile Dysfunction

Severe erectile disorders for which a penile implant may be appropriate usually have one of three main causes: impaired blood flow to the penis, induratio penis plastica (Peyronie's disease), or nerve damage following radical prostate removal. Vascular problems reduce blood flow to the penis and thereby cause erectile dysfunction of varying severity. Induratio penis plastica causes hardened areas within the erectile tissue, which can further restrict the ability to achieve an erection.

After radical prostate removal, around 50 percent of men develop severe erectile dysfunction[5]. This often comes as a surprise, because this risk is sometimes not adequately discussed before the surgery.

The Psychological Burden – and the Question of Penile Length

Many men who experience severe erectile dysfunction, for example after radical prostate removal, avoid seeking medical help for a long time out of shame. When they eventually do, conservative treatment options are usually tried first, in various stages – rightly so.

If these no longer show any effect after a while, affected patients often experience an additional effect: because natural erections may have been absent for years, the erectile tissue contracts and partially breaks down – the penis becomes shorter. This places an additional burden on many patients.

In most cases, a hydraulic implant can largely restore the original penile length that existed before the underlying condition – either through stretching alone or with an additional reconstructive procedure. This still applies even when the erectile dysfunction has already been present for a long time. In overweight patients, reducing suprapubic fat tissue can additionally help to enhance the visual effect[3].

When Is a Penile Implant Appropriate?

A penile implant is not a first-line therapy. It becomes an option when other treatments have been exhausted or are not suitable:

  • Erectile dysfunction caused by physical damage – for example impaired blood flow or nerve damage following prostate surgery
  • PDE-5 inhibitors (tablets) no longer help or are not tolerated
  • Damage to the erectile tissue caused by induratio penis plastica (Peyronie's disease)
  • Severe erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy – affecting approx. 50 percent of men who undergo the operation

Even with moderate vascular erectile dysfunction, medication – whether tablets or injections – can, under specialist supervision, remain effective for some time and support spontaneous erections that are also psychologically important[8]. A penile implant should only be considered once these options no longer help or are no longer tolerated.

In cases of induratio penis plastica accompanied by erectile dysfunction, the penile implant is also the gold standard, as it corrects both the shape and restores the lost function[7]. If the plaque structure has hardened significantly, treatment should not be delayed too long, otherwise an additional reconstructive grafting procedure may become necessary to restore length – which reduces later patient satisfaction.

Does Surgery Have to Happen Immediately After Prostate Surgery?

No. Even with severe erectile dysfunction after prostate surgery, there is no need to rush. Erectile function can still improve within the first 24 months[6]. At the same time, experience shows that waiting too long can lead to further changes in the penis that make later procedures more complex. The decision on the right timing should therefore always be made on an individual basis.

Diagnostics Before Implantation

The decision to proceed with a penile implant should always be made by a specialist physician with extensive experience both in treating severe erectile disorders and in the implantation technique itself.

A key diagnostic tool is an injection of a vasodilating medication, which checks whether blood flow in the penis is still sufficient for an erection: the medication maximally dilates all the vessels. Vascular erectile dysfunction can be clearly demonstrated with this test. Nerve damage after prostate surgery can be inferred indirectly – if the vessels are working properly, the nerves are usually the affected structure. Damage to the erectile tissue caused by induratio penis plastica, however, cannot be detected with this test; here, a physical examination and an ultrasound are decisive.

Correctly interpreting the test result requires considerable experience, particularly in cases of nerve damage and combined findings. This is exactly one of the reasons why UGRS, as a specialised centre, is frequently consulted for an assessment or a second opinion.

Structure of the Penile Prosthesis

Three-piece hydraulic penile prostheses are considered the gold standard for safety and patient satisfaction[1]. They consist of two cylinders inserted into the natural erectile tissue, a pump located in the scrotum that triggers the erection, and a reservoir placed in the lower abdomen and inserted through the same skin incision. The implants are available in different sizes, feature an antibacterial surface, and allow a natural erection and detumescence function, without the components being visible when not activated.

The Operation – What Really Matters

Implantation sounds technically simple: all three components are inserted through a single small incision between the penis and scrotum, the pump is placed invisibly in the scrotum, the reservoir is inserted through the same access point in the lower abdomen, and the skin is then closed – leaving a scar that is barely visible later. The procedure is generally performed on an outpatient basis under general anaesthesia.

In reality, the operation is surgically highly demanding, and the results depend significantly on the experience of the surgeon. When performed inadequately, the following problems typically occur: an incorrect implant length resulting in an unnatural appearance, pain, or instability, when a clinic only stocks a few sizes; improper technique with the risk of the implant breaking through the tip of the penis; imprecise placement of the pump, causing it to become visible or difficult to operate; damage to the tubing or cylinders caused by unsuitable instruments not designed for the implant; an increased risk of infection due to inadequate disinfection; and visible or painful scarring caused by improper suturing.

One of the dangers of prosthesis implantation is infection of the wound cavity. The risk of this is significantly influenced by the duration of the operation. This is why the surgeon's experience is so important: greater experience shortens the operating time and, with it, considerably reduces the risk of infection.

Even seemingly minor details have a demonstrable influence on the outcome: whether the wound drain is left in place for 24 or 72 hours measurably affects the infection rate[11]. Such finer points are, as a rule, known only to a very experienced surgeon – one reason why many patients specifically choose UGRS physicians.

Healing Process

The procedure can be performed on an outpatient basis, thanks to the extensive experience of the UGRS surgeons. Staying overnight in a hotel near the clinic is recommended, so that no long journey home is required on the day of surgery itself. An overnight stay at the clinic is of course also possible, if preferred. The subsequent healing process typically proceeds as follows:

  • Days 1–4: Physical rest, mild discomfort possible
  • From day 3–4: Return to everyday activities for office-based work
  • After 4 weeks: First activation of the implant
  • After 5 weeks: Sexual intercourse and sport possible again

Completely abstaining from smoking during the healing phase, along with optimally controlled diabetes (if present), is of great importance for the healing outcome. Both factors have a demonstrable influence on wound healing and infection rate[14][15][16], and therefore also on the likelihood that corrective surgery becomes necessary. Patients are therefore advised to abstain from smoking entirely during the healing phase, to have any existing diabetes optimally managed in consultation with their family doctor, and to strictly follow the aftercare instructions provided by the surgeon.

Combining With Penis Enlargement

Penis enlargement and a penile implant can be combined – but only with particular expertise. Without a specific technique, the penis would become unstable during erection. UGRS has developed its own method for this, to provide additional stabilisation of the penile base for the prosthesis.

The sequence is mandatory: penis enlargement is performed first, and once healing is complete – usually after around six months – the prosthesis is implanted.

Does Age Play a Role in Surgical Success?

No – age alone plays no role in the success of the procedure. Patients both under and over 75 years of age achieve comparable results and would recommend penile implant surgery at similar rates[17]. Age can only become problematic if it is accompanied by an age-related cognitive impairment such as dementia[18], which could prevent the patient from operating the prosthesis correctly or from behaving appropriately during aftercare.

A professionally implanted penile prosthesis also does not interfere with later urological treatments – for example in connection with prostate conditions[19]. Other urological procedures remain fully possible without restriction.

Costs and Reimbursement

High-quality medical care has its price, especially when the quality of the materials used plays a significant role. At UGRS, we rely on transparent pricing with no hidden extra costs.

The implantation of a hydraulic penile prosthesis costs approx. €9,500. This includes the examination, initial consultation, surgery, anaesthesia, as well as aftercare and medical follow-up. In addition, there is the cost of the implant itself, at approx. €8,000. Payment can be made by bank transfer, credit card, cash, or other flexible payment options.

Private health insurance not infrequently covers the cost of the prosthesis – though usually only if the operation takes place in the private ward of a statutory hospital; this should not be equated with an actual private clinic. Under European legislation, privately insured patients additionally have the option, when treated at the UGRS centre in Spain, of receiving significantly higher reimbursement of up to 90 percent, even if only minimal or no reimbursement would be available in Germany. Please feel free to contact us if you are interested in this option.

For patients with statutory health insurance, this option is unfortunately not available, owing to the strict separation between the statutory and private systems in Germany. We can only treat patients with statutory insurance on a self-pay basis.

Our Experience, Your Advantage

20 Years – and a Track Record That Proves It

The surgical treatment of severe erectile disorders using a penile implant is among the most demanding procedures in reconstructive genital surgery. The choice of surgeon is therefore one of the most important decisions patients make.

UGRS Center Darmstadt has more than 20 years of experience in reconstructive surgery of the male genital area. Prosthesis surgery is led by Prof. Agustín Fraile Poblador.

  • More than 20 years of experience in reconstructive genital surgery
  • Specialisation in microsurgical reconstruction techniques
  • Holistic treatment concept: function, form, and psychological well-being
  • Discreet consultation, confidential atmosphere

When Is a Second Opinion Worthwhile?

The surgical treatment of severe erectile disorders using a penile implant is among the most demanding procedures in reconstructive genital surgery. The choice of surgeon is therefore one of the most important decisions patients make.

You don't have to figure this out alone.

The decision to have a penile implant is always a personal one. Our goal is not to persuade you to undergo a procedure – but to give you an honest basis on which you can decide for yourself.

Many of our patients didn't dare bring up this topic for years. The first step isn't a procedure – it's a conversation.

Write to us, call us, or book an appointment online for an initial conversation.

The first step isn't a procedure – it's a conversation.

Jörg Hagen

Your personal point of contact, Mr Jörg Hagen, Medical Director of UGRS International GmbH, is happy to answer your questions about the treatment and its process.

+49 6151 606 1034+49 152 275 552 37kontakt@ugrs.de

Monday to Friday

9:30 AM – 7:00 PM

or by individual arrangement

Or send us your question. If you'd like a callback, feel free to add your phone number and a time when you can be reached.

Sources & References

  1. 1. Patel J, Zakkar B, Polchert M, Tannenbaum J, Dick B, Raheem O. (2024) Recent technological development of penile prosthesis: a literature review. Transl Androl Urol. 2024 Jan 31;13(1):165-184.
    DOI: 10.21037/tau-22-741 PubMed: 38404551
  2. 2. Pastuszak AW, Lentz AC, Farooq A, Jones L, Bella AJ. (2015) Technological Improvements in Three-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Design over the Past 40 Years. J Sex Med. 2015 Nov;12 Suppl 7:415-21.
    DOI: 10.1111/jsm.13004 PubMed: 26565568
  3. 3. Loh-Doyle JC, Markarian E, Burg M, Boyd S. (2023) Suprapubic Lipectomy and Placement of a Three-piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis. Urology. 2023 Nov;181:e204.
    DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.07.029 PubMed: 37549696
  4. 4. Loh-Doyle J, Patil MB, Sawkar H, Wayne K, Boyd SD. (2018) 3-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement Following Radical Cystoprostatectomy and Urinary Diversion: Technique and Outcomes. J Sex Med. 2018 Jun;15(6):907-913.
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.01.014 PubMed: 29452979
  5. 5. Vahlensieck W, Sommer F, Mathers MJ, Gilbert T, Waidelich R. (2011) Beratung zur erektilen Dysfunktion während stationärer Rehabilitation nach radikaler Prostatektomie [Counselling for erectile dysfunction during inpatient rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy]. Urologe A. 2011 Apr;50(4):417-24.
    DOI: 10.1007/s00120-010-2476-4 PubMed: 21369872
  6. 6. Mathers MJ, Klotz T, Vahlensieck W, Zellner M, Lümmen G, Roth S, Huland H, Sommer F. (2008) Ist eine Rehabilitation der erektilen Funktion nach beckenchirurgischen Eingriffen sinnvoll? Literaturübersicht vom Sport bis zur PDE-5-Inhibitoren-Gabe [Is rehabilitation of erectile function following pelvic surgery reasonable? Review of the literature: from sports to PDE5 inhibitors]. Urologe A. 2008 Jun;47(6):685-92.
    DOI: 10.1007/s00120-008-1668-7 PubMed: 18392605
  7. 7. Ziegelmann MJ, Langbo WA, Bajic P, Levine LA. (2023) Comparison of patient-reported outcomes after penile prosthesis placement in men with and without Peyronie’s disease. Int J Impot Res. 2023 Sep;35(6):569-576.
    DOI: 10.1038/s41443-022-00600-5 PubMed: 36038732
  8. 8. Sommer F, Klotz T, Engelmann U. (2007) Improved spontaneous erectile function in men with mild-to-moderate arteriogenic erectile dysfunction treated with a nightly dose of inhibitors for one year: a randomized trial. Asian J Androl. 2007 Jan;9(1):134-41.
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-7262.2007.00233.x PubMed: 17187165
  9. 9. Moukhtar Hammad MA, Barham DW, Sanford DI, Amini E, Jenkins L, Yafi FA. (2023) Maximizing outcomes in penile prosthetic surgery: exploring strategies to prevent and manage infectious and non-infectious complications. Int J Impot Res. 2023 Nov;35(7):613-619.
    DOI: 10.1038/s41443-023-00773-7 PubMed: 37828138
  10. 10. Ancha N, Eldin M, Woodle T, Gereta S, Hariprasad K, Butler I, Charles Osterberg E. (2024) Current devices, outcomes, and pain management considerations in penile implant surgery: an updated review of the literature. Asian J Androl. 2024 Jul 1;26(4):335-343.
    DOI: 10.4103/aja202386 PubMed: 38376174
  11. 11. Osmonov D, Ragheb AM, Petry T, Eraky A, Bettocchi C, Lamers KG, Van Renterghem K, Tropmann-Frick M, Chung E, Jünemann KP, Garaffa G, Porst H, Mohamed AG, Wilson SK. (2025) Value of prolonged scrotal drainage after penile prosthesis implantation: a multicenter prospective nonrandomized pilot study. Int J Impot Res. 2025 Jan;37(1):87-91.
    DOI: 10.1038/s41443-023-00710-8 PubMed: 37169878
  12. 12. Palmisano F, Boeri L, Ievoli R, Sánchez-Curbelo J, Spinelli MG, Gregori A, Granata AM, Ruiz-Castañé E, Montanari E, Sarquella-Geli J. (2022) Ten-year experience with penile prosthetic surgery for the treatment of erectile dysfunction: outcomes of a tertiary referral center and predictors of early prosthetic infection. Asian J Androl. 2022 Jan-Feb;24(1):32-39.
    DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_27_21 PubMed: 33975985
  13. 13. Hawks-Ladds N, Babar M, Labagnara K, Loloi J, Patel RD, Aalami Harandi A, Zhu M, Salami A, Maria P. (2024) Risk factors for reoperation of inflatable penile prosthesis among an urban population in a high-volume center. Int J Impot Res. 2024 Aug.
    DOI: 10.1038/s41443-024-00966-8 PubMed: 39187572
  14. 14. Siana JE, Rex S, Gottrup F. (1989) The effect of cigarette smoking on wound healing. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1989;23(3):207-9.
    DOI: 10.3109/02844318909075119 PubMed: 2617221
  15. 15. Siana JE, Gottrup F. (1988) Nikotin og karbonmonoxids indflydelse på perifert vævs funktion og sårheling [The effects of nicotine and carbon monoxide on peripheral tissue function and wound healing]. Ugeskr Laeger. 1988 Jul 4;150(27):1650-2.
    PubMed: 3291348
  16. 16. Jorgensen LN, Kallehave F, Christensen E, Siana JE, Gottrup F. (1998) Less collagen production in smokers. Surgery. 1998 Apr;123(4):450-5.
    PubMed: 9551072
  17. 17. Chung E, Solomon M, DeYoung L, Brock GB. (2014) Clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction rates among elderly male aged ≥75 years with inflatable penile prosthesis implant for medically refractory erectile dysfunction. World J Urol. 2014 Feb;32(1):173-7.
    DOI: 10.1007/s00345-013-1102-7 PubMed: 23708698
  18. 18. Bryk DJ, Zillioux J, Kennady EH, Sun F, Hasken W, Ortiz NM, Rapp DE, Smith RP. (2023) The impact of cognitive impairment in urologic implants: a narrative review. Transl Androl Urol. 2023 Sep 30;12(9):1426-1438.
    DOI: 10.21037/tau-23-226 PubMed: 37814692
  19. 19. Razdan S, Fathollahi A, Razdan S. (2024) Robotic radical prostatectomy (RALP) with pre-existing inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP): technical innovations to improve safety and outcomes. J Robot Surg. 2024 Nov 28;19(1):11.
    DOI: s11701-024-02128-w PubMed: 39607540

Author

Jörg Hagen

Jörg Hagen

UGRS Management

Doctor Profile

Medically Reviewed By

Prof. Agustín Fraile Poblador

Prof. Agustín Fraile Poblador

Urologist, Andrology, Reconstructive Uro-Surgery

Doctor Profile