UGRSTM
Permanent penis girth enhancement without foreign materials

Permanent Penis Girth Enhancement Without Foreign Materials

For 30 years. Evidence-based. Personally performed by Prof. Alessandro Littara or Dr. med. univ. Roberto Melone.

More girth – permanently, and with the body's own material. What sets surgical penis girth enhancement with autologous fat apart from other methods, how the procedure proceeds, and what results are realistic.

Contact UsGo to Treatment
Prof. Alessandro LittaraDr. med. univ. Roberto Melone

Medically Reviewed By: Prof. Alessandro Littara, Dr. med. univ. Roberto Melone

Jörg Hagen

Editorial Review: Jörg Hagen, Lead Physician

Updated on July 21, 2026

What Is Surgical Penis Girth Enhancement?

Surgical penis girth enhancement is a surgical procedure for permanently increasing the circumference of the penis. Unlike penis lengthening – where existing internal length is relocated outward – this procedure changes the diameter of the penile shaft.

At UGRS Center Darmstadt, your surgeons use exclusively the patient's own fat tissue for this purpose. Foreign materials, implants, or synthetic fillers are not used. This decision is not only medically consistent – it also follows the current guideline recommendations of the European Association of Urology (EAU).

For penis girth enhancement, Prof. Alessandro Littara and Dr. med. univ. Roberto Melone are available to you at UGRS Center Darmstadt – two surgeons who are among the most experienced specialists in this field in Europe.

The Key Facts at a Glance
The UGRS medical team

Penis Girth Enhancement at a Glance

Before we go into more depth, here is a first orientation on penis girth enhancement:

Method

Autologous fat transfer beneath the penile skin

Material

Exclusively the patient's own fat tissue

Achievable girth increase

approx. 2 – 4 cm permanent

Fat harvesting site

Inner thigh or lower abdomen

Duration of surgery

approx. 70 minutes (in combination)

Hospital stay

outpatient

Final result

stable after several months

Cost

approx. €7,500 alone / approx. €12,300 combined

Treatment in Detail

It all starts with an honest question.

Felix Jung

Your personal patient advisor, Mr Felix Jung, is happy to answer your questions about the treatment and its process.

+49 6151 606 1034+49 152 275 552 37kontakt@ugrs.de

Monday to Friday

9:30 AM – 7:00 PM

or by individual arrangement

Show contents

Why Autologous Fat – And No Foreign Material

The question of which material is used is decisive in penis girth enhancement. Various approaches exist on the market – from hyaluronic acid injections to autologous fat transplantation to silicone implants and other foreign products. Not all of them are equally safe. Some are not even approved for use in Europe (silicone sheets). The European Association of Urology warns against others in its current 2026 Reproductive and Sexual Health guidelines, because they are largely unresearched or even carry considerable risks. The EAU clearly advises against the use of grafts, silicone, and PRP plasma on the penis.

Names like Phallograft or the P-Shot often sound to patients like established or even innovative procedures, when in fact they are unresearched methods that the EAU clearly criticises in its 2026 guidelines.

We consider this kind of approach by physicians to be disreputable.

Alphafill, for example, is not a hyaluronic acid approved for use on the penis, even though its name may lead patients to assume otherwise.

The current EAU guidelines explicitly point out the risks of various foreign materials in penis-enlarging procedures. These include, among others, inflammatory reactions, rejection reactions, hardening, and, in the worst case, severe tissue damage requiring an elaborate corrective operation.

Why Autologous Fat Is the More Convincing Method

Avoiding foreign material is one of the most important advantages of autologous fat treatment: because exclusively the body's own tissue is used, the risk of rejection reactions is eliminated – in particular capsular fibrosis, which can occur with silicone or other implants. This capsular fibrosis often scars together with the penile nerve and is therefore risky.

With autologous fat, the result feels natural both to the touch and visually, and blends harmoniously into the body's own anatomy.

A significant portion of the transferred fat cells heal in permanently, so the result lasts over the long term. The partial breakdown of transplanted fat tissue during healing has been known for decades and is naturally taken into account when planning your surgery.

Not least, this is an established, scientifically grounded method. Prof. Alessandro Littara and Dr. med. univ. Roberto Melone, who both perform this procedure at UGRS Center to an equal standard, have made avoiding foreign materials a central part of their treatment concept since the very beginning of their careers.

Autologous Fat or Hyaluronic Acid – An Objective Comparison

Hyaluronic acid can be an option for men who initially want to try a non-permanent result or are looking for a minimally invasive introduction. UGRS does not perform this procedure – we focus on the permanent autologous fat method. An honest assessment of both approaches is, for us, part of every consultation.

No Glans Enlargement With Hyaluronic Acid

We have deliberately decided against offering this technique. We do not perform it. This method, which is often marketed to patients as harmless and safe, in fact carries considerable risks.

If the intended tissue expansion occurs outward rather than inward, an unsightly glans covered in spike-like nodules can result. These can practically no longer be removed, since each one would have to be cut away individually, leaving subsequent scarring.

All of us at UGRS feel committed to our patients' well-being and do everything we can to protect their health.

How Penis Girth Enhancement Proceeds

Step 1: Fat Harvesting

The body's own fat tissue is harvested from a suitable site – usually the inner thigh or the lower abdomen. The choice of harvesting site is made individually and discussed with you in advance. The procedure at the harvesting site leaves only minimal traces.

Step 2: Processing the Fat

The harvested fat tissue is processed immediately after removal. In this step, damaged cells and other admixtures are removed to optimise the quality of the graft and maximise the rate of fat cells that permanently take hold.

Step 3: Introduction Beneath the Penile Skin

The processed fat is introduced evenly beneath the penile skin. The goal is a natural distribution that feels authentic both visually and to the touch. The entire procedure – in combination with penis lengthening – takes about 70 minutes.

Why More Is Introduced Than the Target

Part of the transferred fat tissue is broken down by the body in the first few weeks after the procedure – this is a well-known and factored-in biological process. For this reason, somewhat more fat is introduced from the outset than would be needed for the planned final result. The final, stable result becomes apparent after several months – not immediately after the operation.

Achievable Results

Based on our clinical experience, the following changes can be achieved:

  • Girth increase: approx. 2 to 4 cm permanent
  • Natural appearance – visually and to the touch
  • Result applies to both the flaccid and erect state

As with this procedure in general, the figures given should be understood as guide values. How much the girth actually increases depends on several individual factors, which are discussed with you as part of the preliminary examination.

For the same reasons we do not perform glans enlargement with hyaluronic acid, we also do not perform it with autologous fat.

Shaft thickening that is not only functionally but also visually natural, with careful shaping of the transition to the glans, is one of the most demanding disciplines in penis enlargement surgery. A surgeon with many years of experience in this area can achieve impressive results.

Dents and asymmetries can occur with penis girth enhancement, but they are very rare with an experienced surgeon, as at UGRS.

The result is also determined by the rate of fat cells that permanently take hold, which can vary from patient to patient: since not all transferred cells heal in over the long term, this biological process has a direct effect on the final result.

There are, in principle, no guaranteed results in medicine, and we deliberately make no such claim. What we can guarantee you, however, is careful, individual planning, an experienced surgical team, and structured aftercare, all geared together toward the best possible result for your personal situation.

Autologous fat girth enhancement should not be performed with standard liposuction cannulas – their diameter is too large and could leave scars.

Who Is Penis Girth Enhancement Suitable For?

The decision to undergo penis girth enhancement should be well considered and based on realistic expectations. It is equally important that enough of the patient's own fat tissue is available for harvesting, since this forms the basis of the entire procedure.

Here too, the principle applies that expectations of the result must align with what is medically realistic if the procedure is to lead to genuine satisfaction. Not least, the patient's general health must allow for an outpatient procedure so that the operation can be carried out safely.

When We Advise Against Penis Girth Enhancement

We are equally open about when we advise against a procedure. A body fat percentage too low to provide enough harvestable material for a satisfactory result is one reason to advise against the operation. If a lack of fat tissue means no enhancement could be achieved at all, we categorically decline to perform the procedure.

The same applies when expectations of the result are unrealistic and cannot be reconciled with the anatomical possibilities. In such cases, it is our task to address this openly in conversation. Health-related contraindications can also rule out a procedure.

In a personal consultation, we carefully examine together with you whether a procedure makes medical sense and is anatomically feasible for you, before any decision is made.

Combining With Penis Lengthening

Most patients opt for the combination of girth enhancement and lengthening. The reason lies in proportion: girth enhancement alone, without a corresponding adjustment in length, can make the overall appearance look unbalanced. Combining both allows for a coherent overall result.

You can learn more about the method of penis lengthening on the corresponding page.

What Does Penis Girth Enhancement Cost

The cost of penis girth enhancement depends on the individual treatment plan and the scope of the procedure.

  • Girth enhancement only: approx. €7,500
  • Combination of girth enhancement + lengthening (recommended): approx. €12,300

The price includes medical consultation, the procedure, anaesthesia, use of the operating facilities, and medical aftercare. Please feel free to contact us regarding payment options and further details.

Frequently Asked Questions About Penis Girth Enhancement

The portion of the autologous fat that permanently takes hold remains permanent. Since part of it is biologically broken down, somewhat more is introduced from the outset than would be necessary. The final, stable result is reached after several months – and is then permanent.

Yes. Because the body’s own fat tissue is used, the result matches natural tissue in consistency and feel. Many patients report that partners do not notice any difference from natural tissue.

Fat harvesting is carried out through very small incisions that are barely visible once healing proceeds normally. The exact harvesting site is discussed with you individually beforehand.

After five weeks, sport is possible again without restriction. In the first few weeks, we recommend taking it easy so as not to impair healing.

Since it is the body’s own fat tissue, the fat that has been introduced generally behaves like fat elsewhere in the body – meaning it can, in theory, react to significant weight changes. In practice, however, the effects are minor. Extreme weight loss should, where possible, not take place immediately before or after the procedure.

Our Experience, Your Advantage

30 Years – And a Track Record That Proves It

Surgical penis lengthening was long a subject hardly anyone spoke about publicly – neither patients nor doctors. Since the early 1990s, UGRS physicians have helped bring this procedure out of the grey zone and into evidence-based medicine: through consistent quality, scientific publications, and the courage to take seriously a field others avoided.

This didn't go unnoticed. In 2014, the British Guardian called Germany the world champion of penis enlargement – with direct reference to the work of our physicians. Prof. Littara remains to this day the only physician named by name in the EAU guidelines for this field[56].

What this means for you: when you come to us, you're not speaking with someone who has offered this procedure for a few years. You're speaking with the team that helped shape this field.

  • Performing surgical penis girth enhancement since 1993
  • Exclusive use of the patient's own tissue – no foreign implants[1][6]
  • Guideline-compliant approach following EAU recommendations[56]
  • Structured aftercare as a fixed part of the treatment concept
  • Discreet consultation, confidential atmosphere

You don't have to figure this out alone.

The decision for surgical penis enlargement is always a personal one. Our goal is not to convince you to have a procedure – but to give you an honest basis on which you can decide for yourself.

Many of our patients didn't dare bring up this topic for years. The first step isn't a procedure – it's a conversation.

Write to us, call us, or book an appointment online for an initial conversation.

The first step isn't a procedure – it's a conversation.

Point of contact

Over 3,000 men a year confidentially reach out to us with their questions. We listen and give answers. Discreetly and with no obligation.

+49 6151 606 1034+49 152 275 552 37kontakt@ugrs.de

Monday to Friday

9:30 AM – 7:00 PM

or by individual arrangement

Or send us your question. If you'd like a callback, feel free to add your phone number and a time when you can be reached.

Further Information on Penis Girth Enhancement

Sources & References

  1. 1. Littara A, Melone R, Morales-Medina JC, Iannitti T, Palmieri B. (2019) Cosmetic penile enhancement surgery: a 3-year single-centre retrospective clinical evaluation of 355 cases. Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 19;9(1):6323.
    DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-41652-w PubMed: 31004096
  2. 2. American Board of Urology (2024) Residency Requirements and Training Standards.
    Link: ABU Residency Requirements
  3. 3. McDougall EM, Watters TJ, Clayman RV. (2007) 4-year curriculum for urology residency training. J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2540-4.
    DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.035 PubMed: 17937938
  4. 4. Trost L, Watter DN, Carrier S, Khera M, Yafi FA, Bernie HL, Ziegelmann M, Köhler T. (2024) Cosmetic penile enhancement procedures: an SMSNA position statement. J Sex Med. 2024 May 28;21(6):573-578.
    DOI: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdae045 PubMed: 38654638
  5. 5. Vardi Y, Har-Shai Y, Gil T, Gruenwald I. (2008) A critical analysis of penile enhancement procedures for patients with normal penile size: surgical techniques, success, and complications. Eur Urol. 2008 Nov;54(5):1042-50.
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.07.080 PubMed: 18760874
  6. 6. Falagario UG, Piramide F, Pang KH, Durukan E, Tzelves L, Ricapito A, Baekelandt L, Checcucci E, Carrion DM, Bettocchi C, Esperto F. (2024) Techniques for Penile Augmentation Surgery: A Systematic Review of Surgical Outcomes, Complications, and Quality of Life. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 May 2;60(5):758.
    DOI: 10.3390/medicina60050758 PubMed: 38792941
  7. 7. Xing MH, Hou SW, Raheem OA. (2022) Aesthetic Penile Augmentation Procedures: A Comprehensive and Current Perspective. Curr Urol Rep. 2022 Dec;23(12):355-361.
    DOI: 10.1007/s11934-022-01123-8 PubMed: 36350528
  8. 8. Colombo F, Casarico A. (2008) Penile enlargement. Curr Opin Urol. 2008 Nov;18(6):583-8.
    DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32830fe427 PubMed: 18832943
  9. 9. Manfredi C, Romero Otero J, Djinovic R. (2022) Penile girth enhancement procedures for aesthetic purposes. Int J Impot Res. 2022 May;34(4):337-342.
    DOI: 10.1038/s41443-021-00459-y PubMed: 34257403
  10. 10. Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, Goodney PP, Wennberg DE, Lucas FL. (2003) Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003 Nov 27;349(22):2117-27.
    DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa035205 PubMed: 14645640
  11. 11. Chowdhury MM, Dagash H, Pierro A. (2007) A systematic review of the impact of volume of surgery and specialization on patient outcome. Br J Surg. 2007 Feb;94(2):145-61.
    DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5714 PubMed: 17256810
  12. 12. Mitchell P, Gottschalk M, Butts G, Xerogeanes J. (2013) Surgical site infection: A comparison of multispecialty and single specialty outpatient facilities. J Orthop. 2013 Sep 5;10(3):111-4.
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2013.07.005 PubMed: 24396225
  13. 13. Pang G, Kwong M, Schlachta CM, Alkhamesi NA, Hawel JD, Elnahas AI. (2021) Safety of Same-day Discharge in High-risk Patients Undergoing Ambulatory General Surgery. J Surg Res. 2021 Jul;263:71-77.
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.01.024 PubMed: 33639372
  14. 14. Su X, Zhao Z, Zhang W, Tian Y, Wang X, Yuan X, Tian S. (2024) Sedation versus general anesthesia on all-cause mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Apr 2;24(1):126.
    DOI: 10.1186/s12871-024-02505-w PubMed: 38565990
  15. 15. Fedok FG, Ferraro RE, Kingsley CP, Fornadley JA. (2000) Operative times, postanesthesia recovery times, and complications during sinonasal surgery using general anesthesia and local anesthesia with sedation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000 Apr;122(4):560-6.
    DOI: 10.1067/mhn.2000.10049 PubMed: 10740178
  16. 16. Xu L, Zhao M, Yang Z, Chen W, Li Y, Ma N, Wang W, Feng J, Liu Q, Ma T. (2016) Modified Penile Augmentation by Dermal-Fat Graft in Post-Hypospadias Adults. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016 Feb;40(1):120-9.
    DOI: 10.1007/s00266-015-0593-6 PubMed: 26705273
  17. 17. Xu L, Zhao M, Chen W, Li Y, Yang Z, Ma N, Wang W, Feng J, Liu Q, Ma T. (2016) Augmentation Phalloplasty With Autologous Dermal Fat Graft in the Treatment of „Small Penis“. Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Feb;77 Suppl 1:S60-5.
    DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000782 PubMed: 27070685
  18. 18. Kang DH, Chung JH, Kim YJ, Lee HN, Cho SH, Chang TH, Lee SW. (2012) Efficacy and safety of penile girth enhancement by autologous fat injection for patients with thin penises. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012 Aug;36(4):813-8.
    DOI: 10.1007/s00266-012-9891-4 PubMed: 22527585
  19. 19. Strong AL, Rohrich RJ, Tonnard PL, Vargo JD, Cederna PS. (2024) Technical Precision with Autologous Fat Grafting for Facial Rejuvenation: A Review of the Evolving Science. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Feb 1;153(2):360-377.
    DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010643 PubMed: 37159906
  20. 20. Groen JW, Krastev TK, Hommes J, Wilschut JA, Ritt MJPF, van der Hulst RRJW. (2017) Autologous Fat Transfer for Facial Rejuvenation: A Systematic Review on Technique, Efficacy, and Satisfaction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Dec 22;5(12):e1606.
    DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001606 PubMed: 29632784
  21. 21. Zhao J, Chen C, Lan XD, Qin X, Li D, Zheng Y. (2025) Facial Rejuvenation Strategy in Asian Women with Autologous Fat Transplantation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Apr;49(7):1797-1807.
    DOI: 10.1007/s00266-024-04482-4 PubMed: 39496964
  22. 22. Mamsen FPW, Fischer-Nielsen A, Svalgaard JD, Jensen JD, Jønsson B, Duscher D, Christensen J, Van Leeuwen M, Kiilerich CH, Roider L, Sterodimas A, Munthe-Fog L, Kølle ST. (2024) Correction: Cosmetic Breast Augmentation with Autologous Ex Vivo-Expanded Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cell (Stemform®)-Enriched Fat Grafts: A Study of the First Twenty-Two Real-World Patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Jan;48(2):241-242.
    DOI: 10.1007/s00266-023-03798-x PubMed: 38129355
  23. 23. Li FC, Chen B, Cheng L. (2014) Breast augmentation with autologous fat injection: a report of 105 cases. Ann Plast Surg. 2014 Sep;73 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S37-42.
    DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000271 PubMed: 25003461
  24. 24. Abu Alqam R, Alkhwildi LA, Almaghrabi MT, Alali FK, Khashab RM, Bamatraf MS, Altamimi LA, Alshammari AJ, Alsuhaim A, Fadel ZT. (2025) Hand Rejuvenation Using Autologous Fat Grafting: A Systematic Review of Recommended Doses, Complications, and Patient Satisfaction. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Mar;49(6):1734-1749.
    DOI: 10.1007/s00266-024-04641-7 PubMed: 39806138
  25. 25. La Padula S, Ponzo M, Lombardi M, Iazzetta V, Errico C, Polverino G, Russo F, D’Andrea L, Hersant B, Meningaud JP, Salzano G, Pensato R. (2023) Nanofat in Plastic Reconstructive, Regenerative, and Aesthetic Surgery: A Review of Advancements in Face-Focused Applications. J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 28;12(13):4351.
    DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134351 PubMed: 37445386
  26. 26. Lo Furno D, Tamburino S, Mannino G, Gili E, Lombardo G, Tarico MS, Vancheri C, Giuffrida R, Perrotta RE. (2017) Nanofat 2.0: experimental evidence for a fat grafting rich in mesenchymal stem cells. Physiol Res. 2017 Sep 22;66(4):663-671.
    DOI: 10.33549/physiolres.933451 PubMed: 28406706
  27. 27. Tonnard P, Verpaele A, Peeters G, Hamdi M, Cornelissen M, Declercq H. (2013) Nanofat grafting: basic research and clinical applications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Oct;132(4):1017-1026.
    DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829fe1b0 PubMed: 23783059
  28. 28. Quintero Sierra LA, Biswas R, Conti A, Busato A, Ossanna R, Zingaretti N, Parodi PC, Conti G, Riccio M, Sbarbati A, De Francesco F. (2023) Highly Pluripotent Adipose-Derived Stem Cell-Enriched Nanofat: A Novel Translational System in Stem Cell Therapy. Cell Transplant. 2023 Jan-Dec;32:9636897231175968.
    DOI: 10.1177/09636897231175968 PubMed: 37243545
  29. 29. Dayal A, Bhatia A, Hsu JT. (2022) Fat grafting in aesthetics. Clin Dermatol. 2022 Jan-Feb;40(1):35-44.
    DOI: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2021.08.010 PubMed: 35190062
  30. 30. Seth I, Bulloch G, Gibson D, Chow O, Seth N, Mann GB, Hunter-Smith DJ, Rozen WM. (2024) Autologous Fat Grafting in Breast Augmentation: A Systematic Review Highlighting the Need for Clinical Caution. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Mar 1;153(3):527e-538e.
    DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010614 PubMed: 37166041
  31. 31. Khor NWM, Dhar A, Cameron-Strange A. (2021) The perils of penile enhancement: case report of a fulminant penile infection. BMC Urol. 2021 Aug 24;21(1):115.
    DOI: 10.1186/s12894-021-00878-5 PubMed: 34429077
  32. 32. Shigeev SV, Morozov YE, Gornostaev DV, Uspekhova OA. (2025) Fatal non-thrombotic pulmonary embolism in penis enlargement with injections of hyaluronic acid-based drugs. Sud Med Ekspert. 2025;68(1):59-62. [Russian]
    DOI: 10.17116/sudmed20256801159 PubMed: 40017089
  33. 33. Zhang YL, Sun ZS, Hong WJ, Chen Y, Zhou YF, Luo SK. (2024) Biofilm formation is a risk factor for late and delayed complications of filler injection. Front Microbiol. 2024 Jan 8;14:1297948.
    DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1297948 PubMed: 38260874
  34. 34. Shahrabi Farahani S, Sexton J, Stone JD, Quinn K, Woo SB. (2012) Lip nodules caused by hyaluronic acid filler injection: report of three cases. Head Neck Pathol. 2012 Mar;6(1):16-20.
    DOI: 10.1007/s12105-011-0304-9 PubMed: 21984020
  35. 35. Wang R, Li Y, Li Z, Yao H, Zhai Z. (2024) Hyaluronic acid filler-induced vascular occlusion—Three case reports and overview of prevention and treatment. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2024 Apr;23(4):1217-1223.
    DOI: 10.1111/jocd.16147 PubMed: 38131127
  36. 36. Zhang YL, Chen Y, Sun ZS, Luo SK. (2023) Retrospective Study of Vascular Complications Caused by Hyaluronic Acid Injection. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Dec;47(6):2745-2753.
    DOI: 10.1007/s00266-023-03522-9 PubMed: 37580566
  37. 37. Kapoor KM, Kapoor P, Heydenrych I, Bertossi D. (2020) Vision Loss Associated with Hyaluronic Acid Fillers: A Systematic Review of Literature. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020 Jun;44(3):929-944.
    DOI: 10.1007/s00266-019-01562-8 PubMed: 31822960
  38. 38. Chatrath V, Banerjee PS, Goodman GJ, Rahman E. (2019) Soft-tissue Filler-associated Blindness: A Systematic Review of Case Reports and Case Series. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Apr 2;7(4):e2173.
    DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002173 PubMed: 31321177
  39. 39. Gabrielpillai J, Salamat A, Schaefer C, Kania A, Lunatschek C, Eichhorn KW, Bootz F, Send T. (2020) Hyaluronic Acid-based Filler Injection: Late-onset Thrombosis of the Frontal Vein. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Nov 25;8(11):e3216.
    DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003216 PubMed: 33299692
  40. 40. Elist JJ, Valenzuela R, Hillelsohn J, Feng T, Hosseini A. (2018) A Single-Surgeon Retrospective and Preliminary Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the Penuma Silicone Sleeve Implant for Elective Cosmetic Correction of the Flaccid Penis. J Sex Med. 2018 Sep;15(9):1216-1223.
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.07.006 PubMed: 30145095
  41. 41. Anderson JM, Rodriguez A, Chang DT. (2008) Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Semin Immunol. 2008 Apr;20(2):86-100.
    DOI: 10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.004 PubMed: 18162407
  42. 42. Arciola CR, Campoccia D, Ehrlich GD, Montanaro L. (2015) Biofilm-based implant infections in orthopaedics. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2015;830:29-46.
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-11038-7_2 PubMed: 25366219
  43. 43. Juwono T, Buscaino K, Fernandez-Crespo R, Carrion R. (2021) Infection of the Penuma penile implant and associated post-operative complications: A case report. Urol Case Rep. 2021 Sep 9;39:101846.
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eucr.2021.101846 PubMed: 34567976
  44. 44. Siegal AR, Celtik KE, Razdan S, Sljivich M, Kansas B, Shah B, Levine LA, Valenzuela RJ. (2024) A multi-institutional update on surgical outcomes after penile silicone sleeve implantation. Ther Adv Urol. 2024 Apr 2;16:17562872241241858.
    DOI: 10.1177/17562872241241858 PubMed: 38571490
  45. 45. Alei G, Letizia P, Ricottilli F, Simone P, Alei L, Massoni F, Ricci S. (2012) Original technique for penile girth augmentation through porcine dermal acellular grafts: results in a 69-patient series. J Sex Med. 2012 Jul;9(7):1945-53.
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02744.x PubMed: 22568607
  46. 46. Xu T, Zhang G, Bai W, Li Q, Yang A, Lin Q, Xu T, Zhang X. (2019) Complications and Management of Penile Girth Enhancement with Acellular Dermal Matrix. J Sex Med. 2019 Dec;16(12):2011-2017.
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.09.010 PubMed: 31668731
  47. 47. Zhang CL, Li H, Li Q, Bai WJ, Xu T, Zhang XW. (2020) [Decision regret analysis among Chinese patients receiving penile girth enhancement with acellular dermal matrix]. Chinese. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2020 Aug 18;52(4):678-683.
    DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.04.015 PubMed: 32773800
  48. 48. Adhikari S. (2023) Penis Girth Augmentation Using SEPA Flap and Dermofat Grafts. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2023 Jul-Sep;16(3):198-204.
    DOI: 10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_174_22 PubMed: 38189069
  49. 49. Austoni E, Guarneri A, Cazzaniga A. (2002) A new technique for augmentation phalloplasty: albugineal surgery with bilateral saphenous grafts–three years of experience. Eur Urol. 2002 Sep;42(3):245-253; discussion 252-253.
    DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(02)00264-6 PubMed: 12234509
  50. 50. Mautz BS, Wong BB, Peters RA, Jennions MD. (2013) Penis size interacts with body shape and height to influence male attractiveness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Apr 23;110(17):6925-6930.
    DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1219361110 PubMed: 23569234
  51. 51. Prause N, Park J, Leung S, Miller G. (2015) Women’s Preferences for Penis Size: A New Research Method Using Selection among 3D Models. PLoS One. 2015 Sep 2;10(9):e0133079.
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133079 PubMed: 26332467
  52. 52. Lever, J., Frederick, D. A., & Peplau, L. A. (2006) Does Size Matter? Men’s and Women’s Views on Penis Size Across the Lifespan. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 7(3), 129–143
    Link: Volltext-PDF (UCLA)
  53. 53. Dixson, A. F. (2009) Sexual Selection and the Origins of Human Mating Systems. Oxford University Press.
    DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780199559428.001.0001
  54. 54. Barnhart KT, Izquierdo A, Pretorius ES, Shera DM, Shabbout M, Shaunik A. (2006) Baseline dimensions of the human vagina. Hum Reprod. 2006 Jun;21(6):1618-1622.
    DOI: 10.1093/humrep/del022 PubMed: 16478763
  55. 55. Pendergrass PB, Belovicz MW, Reeves CA. (2003) Surface area of the human vagina as measured from vinyl polysiloxane casts. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2003;55(2):110-113.
    DOI: 10.1159/000070184 PubMed: 12771458
  56. 56. EAU Guidelines Sexual and Reproductive Health / 9. Penile Size Abnormalities And Dysmorphophobia
    Link: uroweb.org

Author

Jörg Hagen

Jörg Hagen

UGRS Management

Doctor Profile

Medically Reviewed By

Prof. Alessandro Littara

Prof. Alessandro Littara

Specialist in Surgical Penis Enlargement

Doctor Profile
Dr. med. univ. Roberto Melone

Dr. med. univ. Roberto Melone

Plastic Surgery

Doctor Profile